2026-10-08 · Policy Insights

India's IT Rules give users a second court of appeal above the platforms themselves: the Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC). In one documented case, a user recovered an Instagram account two to three weeks after filing a GAC complaint — after every one of Meta's internal appeals had failed.

What happened

The GAC is a government committee established under India's IT Rules to hear complaints against intermediaries' grievance decisions. It exists precisely for the "the platform said no" situation: once you hold a final adverse decision from Meta's internal process, the GAC can review it.

The reported case (MediaNama, September 2026) is the proof of concept: a full run of Meta internal appeals, all rejected, followed by a GAC complaint and account recovery in two to three weeks. Treat that timeline as one data point, not a promise — but it establishes that the channel functions.

Scope discipline matters: this path is documented for India entities and India-region cases. Whether equivalent channels exist in other jurisdictions is unconfirmed — do not assume your country has one.

Who's affected

Indian advertisers, creators, and businesses with rejected Meta appeals and real money or operations on the line — plus agencies serving India clients, who should add the GAC to the standard escalation ladder.

KappS's take

Sources: MediaNama, Sep 23 2026; Grievance Appellate Committee mechanism under India's IT Rules.

← Back to Policy Insights